Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Bush's Lawyers Revoked Fourth Amendment

Apparently the First Amendment was also considered subordinate to the needs of the President to do what he wants.

Words fail me. Watch Rachel Maddow explain it all for you:

You know, I'm ready to stop being angry. I don't WANT to spend the next four years still angry at things that happened before my guy got elected. So why do these things keep coming out and killing my Audacity of Hope Buzz? Sigh.

1 comment:

John Angliss said...

We're looking for speakers for our Internet Activism conference next week - specifically those with success stories to share. As Obama is the biggest one of them all, we wondered if you would like to speak in that session?