Obama at Notre Dame

Apparently a small group of Catholic Bishops felt that inviting President Obama to speak at the Notre Dame commencement was, like, capitulating with evil-doers or something.

Curiously those same folks appeared un-bothered when pro-death penalty George W. Bush came to speak. In both cases that small minority of bishops were being nimrods. The President's never going to embrace all the teachings of any church as a policy blueprint. Nor should he.

And anyway, if they'd been successful, those bright young Notre Dame graduates would have missed out on this:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

For the record - I'm as pro-choice as they come but in my perfect world there'd be no abortion because every child conceived would be a wanted child. And by the way, every child born would be cared for. With health care, good education, parental leave for the mother and father, and widely available and affordable child care for working parents. So I'm all for a culture of life if those bishops (the non-nimrody ones) would like to work with me on it.

On Faith

Have a look at Diana's thoughtful comments on Barack Obama and his recent statements about faith based initiatives.

Preserving an office comprising neighborhood organizations including religious institutions does not mean renewing the lease on the ill-conceived faith-based initiative as it exists today. In fact, the impetus for the program Barack Obama has proposed comes from the Senator’s strongest attributes: his experience as a community organizer, and his career as a constitutional lawyer.

As a community organizer, he knows that religious institutions make substantial contributions to neighborhood development and offer relief for struggling families. He knows that churches, synagogues and mosques are there for crisis intervention and to assist members of their communities who are desperate for help. And he is among many Americans who recognized that the true first responders to the overwhelming needs of victims of Hurricane Katrina were those organized by houses of worship.
But he also knows that previous administrations have exploited the willingness of religious institutions to provide relief, using the services given by these organizations as an excuse for withdrawing government support for individuals and communities. Senator Obama has never advocated such a thing. And he’s not doing that now.

How Politics Destroys Religion

I found this story of Douglas Kmiec - a Republican, Catholic and private citizen who has endorsed Barack Obama for President deeply sad. Kmiec, who strongly disagrees with Obama in that he personally opposes abortion and has worked to overturn Roe Versus Wade, spoke out in favor of an Obama presidency.

In an interview over the weekend, Kmiec argued that 35 years after Roe,
opponents of abortion need to contemplate whether "a legal prohibition" of
abortion "is the only way to promote a culture of life."

"To think you have done a generous thing for your neighbor or that you
have built up a culture of life just because you voted for a candidate who says
in his brochure that he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade is far too thin an
understanding of the Catholic faith," he said. Kmiec, a critic of the Bush
administration's Iraq policy, added that Catholics should heed "the broad social
teaching of the church," including its views on war.

What I find so terribly sad about this is that a Catholic priest recently refused to offer Communion to Kmiec on the basis of his endorsement of Obama.

This is a position - the use of Catholic Communion as a weapon against Democrats - that we will surely see more of in this race, having caught a taster of this strategy in 2004 against (Catholic) John Kerry. I find it terribly sad, not because of any harm done to the Obama campaign - I think this incident only serves to highlight the support Obama enjoys from thoughtful religious people such as Kmiec - but for the harm it does to religion in America.

There are countless fine moral judgements that individuals need to take in their political decision making. How can we account for the loss of so many lives in Iraq? How much responsibility for easing the burden of the poor should be born by the taxpayer? If one candidate disagrees with you about one moral issue you feel strongly about and the other disagrees with you on another, what criteria should you use to choose between them?

The whole principle of a free society is to understand that well intentioned people can agonise over these issues and for good reasons come to opposite views on them. For citizens of faith, they ought to be able to address these questions within their own church communities - and if they cannot, if instead they are rejected despite their very best efforts to live up to their own community's ideals, ultimately the church will no longer provide them the moral guidance that they seek.

It is worth saying that a very similar dynamic is responsible for Obama's reluctant decision to leave his own church after so many years. I look on it more in sorrow than in anger.